Conclusioni sulla base O.12

[ron2]

In pratica, da quanto ho capito, xxx, la base 0.12, per densità superiori al 65%, sarebbe esteticamente migliore della 3# perchè non ricorre ai nodi doppi, ma avrebbe l'inconveniente che i capelli si perderebbero più velocemente?

 

Ma non è che i nodi doppi possano provocare l'intrecciamento alla base dei capelli?

[surferste]

la diffrenza sulla tenuta dei capelli e cmqe minima, l unica differenza tra la 3# e la 0.12 e che la 3# e come consistenza calze velate da donna e non e utilizzabile fino ai bordi, la 0.12 e piu rigida e si puo utilizzare fino ai bordi, non e la scelta migliore x il front.

per qunto riguarda le densita jeffrey mi ha detto che sia 3# che 0.12 non danno problemi.

la 0.12 viene utilizzata negli ordini senza bordi x essere utilizzata con la colla ( quindi impercettibile) con densita superiori al 65%, sul front poi si scegli la 64# o la 18#.

io ho visto la 64# della sicurmatica é scompariva completamente da qualunque distanza in colore flash, non oso pensare se fosse stata in dissolvenza rosa.la 18# quindi e piu che invisibile.

[surferste]

Dear xxx,

 

0.12 is a stiff monofilament base material that is less popular these days

because it is not quite invisible enough. It is not lace and is not

recommended for use as a lace front like 18# or 64#. At 90% density you will

be more pleased with the 3# for your base material, but then you could use

0.12 instead. 0.12 is stiff enough to be used right to the edge whereas 3#

is more like a lady's stockings.

 

Jeffrey.

 

__________________________

CoolPiece.com

The Very Best Hair at a Very Low Price.

 

-----Original Message-----

 

 

please any information about an all lace 0.12, advantages and disvantages.

 

i'm pretty young, i'm 30 yo but look like 23 yo ( of course with my current

system on )so i can't go with low densities, density has to be 80% front

( but much lighter at the very edge where you can see knots ), 90% the rest.

 

is 0.12 more invisible than 18# and 64# at the front?

 

 

i'm also checking the forum to get a clear idea of what i desire but the

best is to hear as much as possible from everybody.

 

than you very much for your patience

>-- Messaggio Originale --

>Reply-To:

>From: "CoolPiece"

>To:

>Subject: RE: polyskin sides and back

>Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:27:32 -0800

>

>

>Dear xxx,

>

>We could exchange a hundred emails like this. I would not recommend your

>suggestions for the next design. An 18# base with a higher than 65%

density

>is no good because in order to tie all that hair one, you would need double

>and triple knots which are very easy to see. Poly with Gauze is a less

>detectable edge material than poly skin because there is no ridge you can

>feel at the join. Poly skin can tear also.

>

>There are many more suggestions on the CoolPiece site, and if you post

your

>design idea on the forums, you may get similar discouragements.

>

>Best regards,

>Jeffrey.

>

>__________________________

>CoolPiece.com

>The Very Best Hair at a Very Low Price.

>

>-----Original Message-----

 

>Subject: polyskin sides and back

>

>for the next order i'm thinking:

>front 18#,base 64#, sides and back polyskin 1" depth.density 80% front,

>90% the rest.haircut from 1 to 2 inches long.

>attachement glue.

>

>is 1" depth enough for a strong hold with glue and for showering with hair

>on?

>is your polyskin detactable to the eye for the shine and detactable to

the

>touch?

>

>thak you very much